This has been something weighing heavy on my heart for the past
few months, ever since we heard the obstetrician say that Genesis had a cystic
hygroma. The social issues circulating as of late (I mean they've always been
there, but it seems like they've increased in the past couple months) have
renewed my feelings on the matter.
I want to be
pro-choice. It stands for woman's health, constitutional freedom, education,
and progressivism. To this effect, I have embarked on a rampage of research and
inquiry. The result: according to Google, to be pro-choice, one must by
definition advocate legalized abortion.
My purpose here is
not to accuse, I simply desire to understand. I need to understand the abortion issue.
I have heard such vehement opposition from both sides of the spectrum, each
denouncing the other as malicious and unfeeling. I know that is truly not the
case for either pro-choice or pro-life individuals, so what I am asking is for
someone to help me. I realize this post may be controversial to some, but it
has been heavy on my heart, and I know I must share.
~
Recently I was
watching TV, and one of the characters decided she was going to go back to
school for an intensive four-year degree while taking care of her two kids and
her husband as well as working her own full-time job. An admirable goal! This
woman found out she was pregnant, and in despair she decided she could not
follow her dream of education. In a battle of following your dreams and being
true to herself versus staying home to take care of her family, she decided to
get an abortion. It was a difficult decision, but she felt she had made the
right one and then went on to pursue her fulfilling career.
I was taken aback
by this. One moment there was this prospect of a new baby and its whole life
springing up in my imagination, and the next that prospect was gone because
this woman decided she wanted to follow her career. Yes, this is TV, and I feel
a bit silly thinking so much about a show, but the reality struck me that this
is real life for so many people. A crossroads that leads to either carrying a
baby and being a parent or going on with your life with a hard decision under
your belt.
I do not mean to
trivialize this decision, for I know it is a serious one that many women make.
I also don't want to skirt around what is actually going on here. This is the
part that I don't understand and that I want to. I want to believe that
abortion is an option for women for their own good, for their health and
wellbeing. But even if all that is true, what about that baby?
The words I have
heard used are "embryo" and "fetus", not baby. But what
does a woman who is pregnant (with a wanted pregnancy) say? "I'm having a
baby." That is the usual result of being pregnant, aside from
complications, isn't it? Embryo and fetus lead to baby. So at what point is
this embryo or fetus an actual baby? If when it is born, then what about the
few moments before it is born when it is inside it's mother's womb? How is that
not a baby but passing through a vagina or taken out via cesarean makes it a
baby? During an abortion, isn't that the same thing that happens, only the
embryo or fetus is no longer alive? So at that point, is it a dead baby or is
it just an aborted embryo?
These are not
rhetorical questions, I really want some answers here.
I have been
scouring the internet for some responses, looking at pro-choice websites and
Q&A articles. The questions I find are "Why would someone have
an abortion?", "Does
having an abortion increase my chances of getting breast cancer?", and
"Is
a medical abortion dangerous?". These are all important questions that
a woman should ask for her own wellbeing. However, they do not address the
underlying questions which I am presenting. What about the life that you are
ending and how do you justify it?
Women on Web had the
question "Can you see
the products of the abortion (placenta, embryo, blood) and what should you do
with them?" which most closely pertained to my ponderings. The answer was
this:
Most of the time
women can see blood and tissue in their sanitary napkin or in the toilet. The
(very small) embryo is usually passed within this blood and tissue in such as
way that it goes unnoticed by the woman. However, it is possible that you might
see the (very small) embryo. Depending on the length of the pregnancy, a small
pregnancy sac with some tissue around it may be visible. For instance, if you
are only five to six weeks pregnant, there will be no visible sac. At nine
weeks, you might be able to find a sac in the blood and it is possible that you
might see the embryo. With a pregnancy of 8 or 9 weeks, the embryo is about 2,5
cm. This can be distressing.
It is best to flush everything down the toilet or
to wrap the sanitary pads in a plastic bag and throw them away.
When I was pregnant with Genny, our first
ultrasound was at 12 weeks.
In another article on Women on Web addressing how many weeks into your
pregnancy you can get a medical abortion, it stated that a "medical abortion
has bee shown to be effective through the first trimester (12 weeks) and has
been successfully used during the second trimester." If I were to have
lost Genesis at this time in my pregnancy, I would have been absolutely devastated.
In fact, I thought day after day that this was going to happen, and it
heartbreakingly did happen to several people that I am close to. If I had had
an abortion, the advice would have been for me to flush the "products of
the abortion" down the toilet. If I had had a miscarriage, that would have
been my precious baby that I had lost. If the only difference in value of fetal
or embryonic life is my emotional investment in its development, then what does
that say for the rights of the unborn baby (or embryo or fetus, whatever term
you prefer to use)?
The logic that I am trying to grasp would infer
that when Genesis was an embryo at 12 weeks gestation, there
would have been no pain for the fetus (possibly, or maybe pain
killers would have been used) had it been terminated, and that this is
not the same thing as ending the life of a child. At what point in my pregnancy
did Genesis become a baby, a child, my offspring? I do not believe that most
pro-choice individuals consider embryos and fetuses to be "'lumps of
tissue' or 'blobs'" as Sarah on The Pro Choice Action Network
single-mindedly stated.
On the other hand, I do want to know what the embryo/fetus is considered to be.
I would like to
address the health and wellbeing of these women, which is the focal point of
the pro-choice movement. For many women who have been hurt or who are in a less
than ideal situation to be pregnant, it seems that having a baby is not the
right thing to do. It is extremely taxing on the body, as countless post-natal
products can attest. The birthing process is...well, pretty gross despite what
a "miracle" it's supposed to be. Victims of rape and abuse are not
able to "move on" with their lives when impregnated. Ambitions and
goals become impossible to attain in some cases. Not to mention, every baby
deserves to have a fulfilled life. It seems a service to the child to spare it
the pain and hardship that it will inevitably face.
Let me tell you as
a new mom that having a baby and raising it is hard. Freaking hard. I can't
imagine doing this alone. It is frustrating because you do not understand the
tiny little person who so obviously needs something (you can tell from the
screaming), and you want to help, but none of your attempts are successful and
it seems that baby will never stop and you're tired and all the
advice swims around in your brain making you feel like you aren't "doing
it right"...
It's a lot.
But even in those
hardest of times, when I had tears of desperation in my eyes, I could look down
at Genesis and see how helpless she was. Screaming, crying, pooping everywhere,
it didn't matter. She depends on me (and quite selfishly, I might add) for
everything. She always has, from the moment she came into being inside of me. This is what I cannot overlook. The
helplessness of the babies who depend on their mommies. These mommies who
define the worth of their unborn children.
So yes, I want to
be pro-choice. I ache for women who have been abused, who find themselves with
serious health complications or the realization that their unborn baby has a
serious complication. But I ache for those babies, too, who will never even get
the chance to have a life because of the choice. Anyone who can persuade me
otherwise, I am happy to listen. But for now, I cannot be pro-choice.
